Sometimes lectionary mix-ups lead to theological insight. At
least that’s the story I’m sticking to.
I have a confession to make. I’ve had my propers mixed up
since the week after the Day of Pentecost. I’ve been off by a week, which has
led to all sorts of liturgical, lectionary mishaps. For starters, I erroneously
pointed a parishioner to the wrong week of the Daily Office. I hope she figured
it out. Then, because I was out of town last week, I printed out the lessons
for Wednesday’s midday service for someone else to read. Then, yesterday when I
was preparing for the same service, I realized that the readings I was prepared
to preach on were the same ones I printed out for last week, so I had to do a
last-minute switch and read the previous week’s actual lessons. Because of
that, today’s lesson has come alive in a whole new way.
Yesterday, I read Matthew 14:1-12—the story of Herod’s
ordered decapitation of John the Baptist. That passage begins when Herod
reflects on the rising popularity of Jesus, saying, “This is John the Baptist;
he has been raised from the dead, and for this reason these powers are at work
in him.” Herod was racked with guilt and fear, which stemmed from the awkward
means through which he ordered his prisoner’s execution. He was tricked by a
seductive woman, who got Herod to promise her anything, to which she replied, “the
head of John the Baptist on a platter.” Matthew tells us that Herod was sad by
this, and, although this gospel account doesn’t let the tetrarch off the hook
by making him overly sympathetic to JtheB (like Mark), it does retain the
conflicted nature of the story’s end.
Fast-forward a week and a day today’s lesson—Matthew 16:13-20.
Jesus says to his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” And the
disciples reply, “Some say John the Baptist, but others Elijah, and still
others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” And so the link is made. Usually, I
read this story as Peter’s great confession (a moment we commemorate in the
church calendar). This time, though, I’m drawn to the mistaken identity—some
say John the Baptist. Interesting.
What leads people to mistake Jesus for someone else? For
Herod, it was superstitious, unresolved angst. For others, it might have been
unfulfilled hopes and dreams. And for others, it might have been simple misunderstanding.
Some say John the Baptist. Of course, that’s silly. They were contemporaries.
How could they be the same person? Yet so strong is the human desire to make
concrete relationships that we’ll convince ourselves of the strangest things.
Last night, I went to a minor league baseball game with our
youth group. While there, I overheard a parent say to his son, “See that! When
you stop paying attention to the game, bad things happen.” The opposing team
had just scored two runs, and, although I think he was joking, the father
attributed that unwanted success to his son’s lack of paying attention. That’s
ridiculous. But, before any of us thinks a critical thought, consider this.
When was the last time you thought about switching seats or walking out of the
room or changing channels when your favorite team was down just in case that
might help the situation?
We like to think of things in our terms. Who is Jesus? He’s
the superhero I’ve made him out to be in my head. But the beauty of Peter’s
confession is that Jesus is none of those things that people think he is. He’s
not another JtheB or Elijah or Jeremiah or one of the prophets. He is the
messiah. He is unique. He shatters our expectations and defies our attempts to
relegate him to analogies we understand. Only God himself could have revealed
that to Peter, and we must trust that only God can show us who Jesus really is.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.