It will be hard for me to preach on anything but the Genesislesson this week. That’s not because I know what the Spirit is leading me to
say about. It’s only because the story of Abraham and the smoking fire pot is
utterly cool.
1. God
promises old-man Abram (and his barren wife) descendants as numerous as the
stars.
2. Abram
believes God’s promise.
3. God
reckons Abram’s belief as righteousness—implying a right relationship.
4. Then,
God promises Abram the land.
5. Abram
asks God for proof.
6. Through
a bizarre mixture of animal sacrifice, hallucinatory dreaming, and ancient
custom, God pledges his commitment to Abram and makes a covenant with him.
Almost any part of that could be a sermon. St. Paul makes a
big deal about the belief leading to righteousness in his letter to the Romans.
Some might say that this passage—more than any other in the bible—is responsible
for the Evangelical movement in Christianity. Abram’s model becomes Paul’s
model for explaining the Jesus-event, and, thus, we are encouraged to believe in
Jesus with faith like Abram in order to be made righteous. It’s a big deal.
But what about the covenant? What sort of humanity believes
that God would enter a covenant with a human being and his descendants? Imagine
an A-list celebrity going to prom with a C-list student. Why would that happen?
Well, maybe as a publicity stunt. And maybe that’s true for God as well. Is God
reaching out to Abram in covenant primarily to show the world who he is—a God
of relationship? It’s interesting to me that we believe in a God of covenants—such
a human, transactional way of talking about God—but that unfathomable
combination of God as totally other and God as intimately related is at the
heart of our faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.