A week ago I used a Family
Guy reference in a sermon for a midweek healing service. I warned the
congregation that Family Guy
references almost never belong in a sermon, but I shared it with them anyway.
They laughed politely.
Today, in the same service with many of the same people in
the congregation, I used another Family
Guy reference. Something must be wrong! Actually, this time I didn’t
actually tell them a story from the crude cartoon show. Instead, I told them
about a time when I preached at a Lenten service and tried to use a different Family Guy image that totally and
completely fell flat. I should have known better. The average age in the
congregation that day appeared to be 70, and I knew before I even opened my
mouth that the ironic, satiric, biting humor of the cartoon would fail to
connect with the audience. I used it anyway, and no one—except maybe the rector—laughed.
It wasn’t the first time I’d used an image that didn’t connect with the
congregation, nor will last week’s poor attempt be my last.
The reason I bring it up is that in today’s gospel lesson
(John 10:1-18) Jesus uses an image that falls as flat as my Family Guy story. “Anyone who does not
enter the sheepfold by the gate but climbs in by another way is a thief or a
bandit,” Jesus said. This is the beginning of his sheep-and-shepherd talk. He
goes on for a little while, using the image of a sheepfold to convey to the
disciples what the true, God-sent, good shepherd is like. But, about halfway
through, John zips a little editorial zinger in that makes me laugh out loud: “Jesus
used this figure of speech with them, but they did not understand what he was
saying to them.” In other words, they didn’t get it.
So Jesus keeps right on going. He explains it a little
clearer—“I am the gate”—but he still dances around with conflicting images that
don’t make a lot of sense to me and, I’ll guess, made even less sense to the
disciples. “I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for
the sheep.” Can you see the puzzled looks on the disciples’ faces? Can you hear
them muttering to themselves, “What’s he talking about?” They weren’t following
someone whom they expected to die. Why would anyone follow a savior who is
going to be crucified? That doesn’t make sense. How could it…on their side of
the resurrection?
What Jesus says to his disciples about laying down his life
and picking it up again makes sense to those of us who live on the other side of
the empty tomb. And the disciples themselves would figure all of this out once
they had experienced the risen Christ for themselves. But until then—until you
live in the place of resurrection—Jesus doesn’t make sense.
Too often, I forget to look at the world through Easter
goggles. That’s the lens through which we are supposed to view the world. And
it’s a hard way to see things—a way that doesn’t make sense. Why would someone
lay down his life? Why would we take up our cross? Who wants to worship a
messiah who died on a tree? Only fools who live in Easter would. I forget that
God’s ways are not the world’s ways. I forget that, with God, life comes
through death. I forget that suffering leads to rebirth. I forget how to empty
myself and accept the costly call to discipleship because I forget to start
with the resurrection.
God has redeemed the brokenness of the world, and God
chooses brokenness to reveal himself to it. That doesn’t make sense to the
world, but it does make sense to Easter people.
you are invited to follow my blog
ReplyDelete