She died before I was born, but I grew up hearing stories
about my father’s mother. Typically, however, those stories came not from my
father but from my mother—her daughter-in-law. Apparently, my “Grandma Rubye”
was a strong woman who kept the house and the family in order. Married to a
surgeon whose career had more than its share of ups and downs, she managed to hold
everything together. Like many women of her day, she took care of everything
except earning a paycheck. In fact, as a dance instructor, she even did that.
When my mother speaks of her mother-in-law, it is with
respectful, almost reverential tones. I don’t think that’s because she was
particularly close to my grandmother. Instead, I think it’s because my mother
was a little intimidated by her. The stories I hear from my mother are about
times when my grandmother showed up late in the evening but still arrived
expecting to eat dinner. They are stories about how loving and affirming she
was but always in the context of being silently demanding. There was, I can
tell, some tension between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, but I think that’s
natural. Overall, though, it seemed to have been a relationship full of love
and mutual concern.
When Jesus tells about the gospel as a sharp quickening agent (this Sunday's gospel lesson),
he uses family relationships to describe how divisive it can be: “father
against son / and son against father / mother against daughter / and daughter
against mother / mother-in-law against daughter-in law / and daughter-in-law
against mother-in-law.” The father-son thing I get. I have a father. I am a
son. And there’s always been some tension between us. It’s supposed to be that
way. I don’t have any sisters, but I can tell my wife and her mother have had
their moments. Their hostility seems to have been more open than that between
my father and me. But the bit about mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law…that
really throws me for a loop.
Jesus did not come to earth to bring peace but a sword (Mark’s
word). Division, as Luke puts it. In a household of five, three will be versus
two. Even close family relationships will be split in half. In other words, the
gospel doesn’t lend itself to mediocre reactions. Like modern art—you either
love it or hate it. No one hears the gospel in its power and says, “Well,
maybe.”
There is no stronger alliance in my family than that between
my wife and my mother. Each has seen my failings. Both still love me. They
share a (usually) unspoken knowledge of what it’s like to deal with me. Like my
mother’s relationship with her mother-in-law, there is a deep sense of
connection shared between the two. No, they aren’t best friends, but I’ve never
seen them at odds with one another. Imagining that the gospel could turn that
relationship on its head is hard for me to do.
Even the relationships that seem most likely to stand the
test of time are subject to the division of the gospel. God’s work is powerful.
It is not subject to human desires. It does not ask whether you’re ready for
it. It shows up and causes strife. Usually, the “gospel” I hear preached in the
contemporary church is the gospel of niceness. Jesus wants us to love each
other and to be friends. Maybe. But that’s not what Luke 12 says. What sort of
gospel should I be preaching? Though it should never be my goal, am I
proclaiming God’s word with enough power to tear families apart?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.