The story of Abraham and the Apostle Paul’s interpretation
of that story in the Christian context are central to my understanding of the
Christian faith. When I was a young Christian, the people who influenced me
most were those who talked about concepts like grace vs. law, justification by
faith, and the free gift of forgiveness. As I read the first two lessons forthe Second Sunday in Lent (Gen. 12:1-4a; Rom. 4: 1-5, 13-17), I find myself drawn
back to those moments when I, like a sponge, soaked up any bit of understanding
I was given. I was filled with the gospel as expressed in the Abraham/Paul
story of God’s amazing promise and humanity’s only response.
Then I read the gospel lesson (John 3:1-17), and I wonder why
these are all stuck together. John’s story of Nicodemus coming to Jesus by
night is a compelling tale. It’s a man risking his status in the community in
order to ask Jesus his burning question: “Who are you???” It’s Jesus’ urging us
all to be reborn by the Spirit. It contains the verse that for so many is the
encapsulation of our faith—John 3:16. (I think that “encapsulation” is often
misunderstood, so I usually avoid it.) But where is the connection with the
Abraham story?
Maybe there’s some ground to cover in what I would argue is
the necessary pairing of John 3:16 and John 3:17.
So many of us think of John 3:16 as the end-all, be-all of
the Christian faith: For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten
son to the end that all who believe in him should not perish but have
everlasting life. It is important. You can’t deny that. But how is it
important? What is Jesus really saying there?
Is he saying, “God sent his son so that those who believe
might be saved…so you’d better believe or else?”
Is he saying, “God sent his son so that those who believe
will live an everlasting life…and those who don’t will perish?”
Is he saying, “God sent his son so that those who believe
will be forever separated from those who don’t in the clearest possible test of
what it means to be saved or damned?”
Does that mean Me + Belief = Salvation while You + Unbelief
= Damnation?
That’s why we need verse 17. Indeed, God did not send his
son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be
saved through him. Put those two verses together, and never let them be split
apart. When read with the verse after it, John 3:16 is a reminder that God is
in the saving-the-world business. Without it, it can be a weapon that
Christians use to bludgeon the rest of the world over the head until they are
relegated to hell. But that’s not the story of faith God has been revealing to
the world since he first called Abraham.
God offers blessing to those who believe because God is a
God of blessing. The divine economy is not built upon the premise that one must
lose if another is to gain. God showering his blessing upon those who accept
him at his word does not necessitate God raining down fire upon those who don’t.
(There’s an argument for that—and against that—but that’s another set of
readings.) We follow in the footsteps of Abraham and Jesus. (Kathy Grieb makes
this point in her commentary The Story ofRomans.) Abraham heard God’s promise of blessing and trusted it enough to
leave everything behind and set out for a new land. Jesus heard God’s promise
of redemption and trusted it enough to give up his life so that God might
redeem the world. Those are stories of blessing. To add a consequence of curse
is a wonderfully human and wonderfully short-sighted tendency that we are
begged to resist. (See what else Paul has to say about the Law in the rest of
Romans.)
I want to see the guy in the crowd at the WWE match holding
up the sign that says “John 3:17.” I want to see him standing right next to the
guy who holds up the sign that says “John 3:16.” They go together. They can’t
be separated.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.