The dog that barks usually bit.
Whoever smelt it dealt it.Whoever denied it supplied it.
Do you remember the childish back-and-forth over which kid
it was who passed gas? Maybe I’m the only one who grew up in such puerile
circles, but I suspect others are familiar with the logic of “the lady doth
protest too much, methinks.”
Ever suspect a child of causing trouble and then have your
suspicions confirmed by an overly denying culprit? One of my favorite Nooma videos by Rob Bell is “Lump,” and
it starts with a story about one of Bell’s sons denying the theft of a small
white ball in a weird, Urkel-like refutation. We can tell when someone goes so
far out of his or her way to claim innocence that that person ends up
suggesting his or her guilt.
So what’s the deal with John the Baptist? In John 1, the Jewish
authorities send priests and Levites to go and investigate what was behind John’s
ministry. They arrive at the Jordan River, where John was baptizing, and they
ask, “Who are you?” Perhaps they forgot the pleasantries that are normally
associated with such an encounter—like “Hello, there. We’ve heard about you.”
Regardless, their question seems innocent enough. “Who are you?” It’s
open-ended. It isn’t accusatory. It gives John the ability to say as much or as
little as he wants.
But what is his reply? “I am not the Messiah.” John the
Gospeller, the editor who is bringing all of this together, introduces John the
Baptist’s comment with some even stranger language: “He confessed and did not
deny it, but confessed, ‘I am not the Messiah.’” Seems pretty suspicious to me.
Now, before we go any further, let’s stop for a moment and derail
all of the conspiracy-theory hijinks and say that John the Baptist wasn’t pretending
to be the Messiah. This isn’t him denying something so firmly that we discover
his guilt. But the nature of the denial—both by John the Gospeller and by John
the Baptist—suggest that others in the crowd were a little suspicious. Think of
this overt, over-the-top, triple denial as both Johns’ way of saying, “This
might be an exciting prophet who has grabbed the attention of a multitude with
his sharp message of repentance, but he isn’t who you might suspect he is.”
So what’s the point of this passage? That’s the real
question for the preacher. This series of questions for John the Baptist by the
Jewish authorities (the priests and their kinfolk, no less!) is intended to
show us what it means to wait for the coming Christ. After the long list of
denials, John’s eventual self-identification as “the voice of one crying out in
the wilderness” lets the reader know that John and his ministry are about
making the way between God and his people straight. God comes to his people not
in the person of John but in the person of Jesus. But God’s people have some “work”
to do to get ready for the coming Messiah, namely be baptized.
It is remarkable to me that the priests and Levites
associate baptism with the work of the Messiah, Elijah, or the Prophet. They
seem surprised that John, although not one of these, is still baptizing. Their
surprise lets us know that their expectation for the Messiah or one of the
prophets of old includes a call to a purification ritual. But John’s
understanding of baptism is different. He knows that baptism isn’t the end—it’s
just the beginning. Baptism is in preparation for what else will come. “I
baptize with water,” he says. “Someone standing among you who is more powerful
than I is coming, and he is holy to the point that I am not even worthy to
untie his sandals in order to wash his feet. He’s the one we are getting ready
for.”
Yes, this story is about repentance, but it’s also about so
much more. It’s about repentance that points us to the coming of the Messiah.
It’s about repentance so that the path between God and his people will be
straight. It’s about repentance that points not to itself but to the good news
of what is coming.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.