I see what they did
there. This Sunday is Trinity Sunday, and each of the three lessons seems to
accent a different person of the Trinity. Isaiah 6:1-8 is all about the
prophet’s encounter with the God of Israel. Romans 8:12-17 is Paul’s urging to
live by the Spirit. John 3:1-17 is Jesus’ encounter with Nicodemus, which
underscores the importance of the Son as the means for salvation. Of course,
that’s a heresy, but, too, so will most of the Trinity Sunday sermons that are
preached this week.
There heresy isn’t
choosing lessons that seem to focus on one person of the Trinity. The heresy is
in me reading them as if the work of the persons is separate and distinct. We
can talk about Father, Son, and Spirit, but we cannot assign different works to
different persons. It’s a fundamental precept of our faith that all three are
united in their work in the created order. You can’t divide it up. If you do,
you end up with three gods instead of one. It works a little like this.
People enjoy saying
that the Father created the world, the Son redeemed it, and the Spirit
sanctifies it. In fact, preachers who want to sound egalitarian and hip replace
the Trinitarian formula “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” with “Creator, Redeemer,
Sanctifier.” But that is like invoking the name of three separate gods. And, in
case you forgot, we don’t have three separate gods.
We worship the one.
As the collect prays this Sunday, somehow (with God’s help) we manage to
believe in one God with three persons. God the Father creates. God the Son creates.
God the Spirit creates. All three redeem. All three sanctify. The fancy Latin
phrase for this doctrine is opera Trinitatis
ad extra indivisa sunt, which means “The operation of the Trinity on the
outside is indivisible.” If you want to be a Christian, you must believe in one
God who eternally exists in three persons. And that means we need to take
another look at the lessons.
Instead of thinking
about each lesson as a distinct featurette on a different person of the
Trinity, consider how God in three persons is at work in all three. That’s
tough, of course, and I’ll start by saying I’m not really sure how to squeeze
the Son and Spirit into the lesson from Isaiah. Other than my professors, no
one has ever accused my theology of being creative (and they didn’t mean it as
a compliment). Maybe one could say that “the hem of his robe” and the voice
with which God speaks represent a Trinitarian identity. Again, I’m not sure.
But the NT texts are easier, right?
Paul urges his
readers in Rome to live by the Spirit. It is the Spirit that enables us to cry,
“Abba! Father!” as a way of identifying God in the same way that his Son did.
The Spirit is our guarantee that we are joint heirs with Christ as children of
God—all three persons working together with the same purpose. Likewise, in
Jesus’ exchange with Nicodemus, the invitation is to be reborn by water and
Spirit. We enter God’s kingdom and enjoy the presence of the Father through our
rebirth into the Spirit so that we may be lifted up just as the Son of Man is
lifted up. Again, all three persons at work as an expression of the unified divine
will.
So, dear preachers
out there, don’t be heretics. And don’t preach three different sermons—one is
enough. Pick a text and preach on it. Let the worship we do this day be our
Trinitarian sermon. Sing St. Patrick’s
Breastplate. Pray the collect. Use the tongue-twisting preface. Invoke the
name of God as “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.” But don’t try to analogize the
mystery of the Holy Trinity. It always results in heresy. And don’t try to
preach the fullness of Trinitarian doctrine in a sermon. There’s a reason it
took the Church over 400 years to find ways of speaking coherently about the
Trinity, and you can’t fit that into a sermon. We are Trinitarian in our
worship and in our belief—both of which are built upon the acceptance of
mystery. Don’t over say it. Let God say it instead.
thanks. great thoughts.
ReplyDelete